RepoArt

Dreamevil2009 (Thursday 20th of November 2008 07:10:55 PM)

Which isn't to bad of numbers im running for a very none aggressive tune, once I get my more aggressive one I should be running 290ish at the wheels or so at the wheels.

Dreamevil2009 (Thursday 20th of November 2008 07:09:36 PM)

Yeah, well unless your running some serious numbers, you would have a very similar fate as would I and I have 346 crank hp and 271 at the wheels, I would too get destroyed by a corvette. Just a fact idk why every one on here is so shocked by the out come.

BklynJayL (Thursday 20th of November 2008 06:24:24 PM)

Wow! The 'Vette left that Subaru like a whole city block! Lol..

BklynJayL (Thursday 20th of November 2008 06:23:15 PM)

Lol.

marioman507 (Thursday 20th of November 2008 06:02:44 PM)

true.. mine's not stock.. tho. i've had a little fun with mine.. lol

Deango2 (Wednesday 19th of November 2008 10:15:58 PM)

thats a bone stock wrx. No STi involved.

rohzuk08 (Wednesday 19th of November 2008 08:14:54 PM)

Hmm just put it this way. a 2007 Kia Sedona minivan runs 16.1 sec and that WRX ran half a second slower.

Dreamevil2009 (Wednesday 19th of November 2008 06:57:07 PM)

Yes, It is a wrx, but no your wrx would not have done much better if it is a stock wrx your versing a muscle car that is a newer corvette not sure exactly on the year but its got between 400-500hp stock your car has 230hp you would get raped, even if your car is like mine which is a 2003 wrx running stage 2 sti numbers currently I would get raped. Its just a simple fact lol

Kamertusbeef (Wednesday 19th of November 2008 04:55:09 AM)

My 2007 Z06 would have also done more better than this one...

mustafajdm (Monday 17th of November 2008 08:06:45 PM)

that is a wrx and a very shity driver in it the person who posts this should know what they are talking about look it the scoop its a wrx