Celebrity Hijack - Amy & Brian Sewell discuss Conceptual art

Back




is it art?

Channel: Entertainment
Uploaded: January 15, 2008 at 7:11 pm
Author: artynmay2

Length: 0:04:41
Rating: 4.92
Views: 5,709

Tags: big brother celebrity hijack 2008 amy jackson conceptual artist discussion andy warhol brian sewell diary room

Video Thumbnail #1:




Video Thumbnail #2:




Video Thumbnail #3:




Video Url:


Embed Code:


Video Comments:
AntEtches (Wednesday 3rd of December 2008 09:44:38 AM)
how about someone uploading his programme about Salvador Dali? that was very interesting.
spinesnapper (Thursday 4th of December 2008 08:13:53 AM)
It has been uploaded. Its great.
redbairn (Monday 24th of November 2008 01:43:31 PM)
"...being married to mr art gallery seems like her best concept! " Always the connections. Hirst is a gobshite. art for artsake my ass! Anybody know of any artist that maybe worse than Damien?
redbairn (Monday 24th of November 2008 01:39:14 PM)
.... :)
redbairn (Monday 24th of November 2008 01:38:57 PM)
rofl. one does!
redbairn (Monday 24th of November 2008 01:37:34 PM)
haha! You should back your statement up before sticking up stupid comments.
tessthenobody (Wednesday 8th of October 2008 09:13:07 PM)
wow, I think it was pretty wrong of that guy to slam her that badly. Every form of art has it's value, I think. I do think some Conceptual art is rubbish, but so are some old 'skillfull' paintings and such, because they are only art for arts sake. At least conceptual art gives the viewer a large amount of respect by allowing them to draw their own conclusions from it. Instead of painting something to demonstrate how awesomely skilled you are at painting.
countofbiarritz (Monday 15th of September 2008 01:39:04 PM)
Mr Sewell is completely correct. Her work is an absurdity, she was asked to defend it; she was incapable of doing so as one cannot defend the indefensible. Whatever you think of him, Sewell is correct. The ability to manipulate string and require opinion is an intellectual vacuum in itself. To manipulate string and to assume a response as a natural reaction betrays a moral vacuum. Sewell is completely in the right to question her vapid self indulgence.
wingback (Thursday 14th of August 2008 03:17:19 PM)
... Play-Cam(.COM) ... frisky mmmmm such a tease, Grace
Domytar (Monday 4th of August 2008 07:17:18 PM)
hello if anyone is confused about this conversation about art just listen to how brian sewell stands on his own words ( he says "I WAS JUST WONDERING AMY WERE ART COMES IN TO ALL THIS "and at the end he says (THE TRUOBLE WITH YOUR ART AMY IS BLARR BLARR BLARR get it he is a massive prick and sucks them to