RepoArt

claudia9N (Sunday 19th of October 2008 01:59:31 AM)

<3 i love u y

admotion26 (Wednesday 8th of October 2008 06:21:35 AM)

really stupit..

xucam (Wednesday 8th of October 2008 01:46:33 PM)

Umm, I think you meant 'stooopit'

rmfyt (Wednesday 24th of September 2008 07:28:31 AM)

LindaMarie1955: What was the point? Are you kidding me?

georei (Tuesday 9th of September 2008 04:19:31 PM)

waste of good charcaol.

empachers (Sunday 17th of August 2008 10:11:38 PM)

These are engineering faculty and grad students from Purdue University. At first, they were trying to speed up the process of lighting a grill, but they got lost somewhere along the way in the sheer pyrotechnic joy of it all and decided to try using liquid oxygen,with the "cool" results that you see here. There was a Dave Barry column about this "experiment." You can search the web for "purdue grill liquid oxygen" or something like that.

blogologist (Monday 21st of July 2008 04:42:19 PM)

Children and matches. A BAD combination.

bensonchad (Monday 21st of July 2008 12:25:20 PM)

Yeah, bet that grass looks nice

kamakazicow (Sunday 20th of July 2008 09:06:37 PM)

You aren't honestly going to justify stupidity vs. boldness on the completely unnecessary starting of fires with chemicals are you? When did boldness involve doing things in the most foolish way possible, rather than the most practical way? I think the smart way to start the fire would have been the safest way, which wouldn't have involved a 6 foot board between the starter and the materials involved. It wouldn't have been quite as cool, but lets not start trying to call this intelligence...

at7000 (Sunday 20th of July 2008 07:46:49 PM)

These engineers must have been the same ones who designed the "O Rings" on the Space Shuttle Challenger...