747 vs. truck
BackDemonstration as to why you don't want to play by a 747.
Channel: Autos & Vehicles
Uploaded: April 29, 2006 at 12:19 pm
Author: justmered
Length: 0:01:40
Rating: 4.59
Views: 843,365
Tags: airplane united truck crash demonstration
Video Comments:
rgra66 (Monday 1st of December 2008 05:20:33 PM)
If there going to do it STICK AN ENGINE AND TRANSMISSION IN THE TRUCK!!!!!
Joonathan92 (Monday 1st of December 2008 05:22:43 AM)
ouch
Weldaz1 (Saturday 29th of November 2008 10:28:43 AM)
Waste of a perfectly good piece-a-shit truck...LMAO!!!! 767...747...I wouldn't
be behind no jet...period!!!! Too bad,
I coulda used it in our junk yard for
yanking out parts & towing...a "junkyard
dog."
peenoysf (Thursday 27th of November 2008 11:55:39 AM)
man people here are dumb....its training video from united, no engine or trans because in the case of it blowing into San Francisco Bay, contamination would be minimal ( like the bay isnt already contaminated). Either engine or not your ass is still gonna get blown away
peenoysf (Thursday 27th of November 2008 11:58:20 AM)
oh and united did get a fine for the truck flying into the bay
ManOfMeans (Sunday 23rd of November 2008 11:40:21 PM)
Guess that's one way to write it off to taxes lmaooo
tooslow01 (Sunday 23rd of November 2008 09:16:47 AM)
I know, but the truck should have its engine and tranny in it to make it more realistic.
pega57 (Saturday 22nd of November 2008 02:12:44 PM)
noooooooooooo! my car! lol
tooslow01 (Friday 21st of November 2008 08:24:12 PM)
No engine and or tranny.
rocketright (Saturday 22nd of November 2008 08:34:53 PM)
Still it would get owned, Mythbusters had an episode and even a fully loaded schoolbus flew like crazy/