Conspiracy of Science - Earth is in fact growing

Back




This video is a Neal Adams animation about his theory that the Earth is growing. This collides with the Pangea theory. Watch it, you will be amazed.

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: February 23, 2007 at 10:29 am
Author: ravious260

Length: 0:10:01
Rating: 3.75
Views: 1,424,235

Tags: SPACE EARTH SCIENCE HISTORY CONSPIRACY BUSH WAR ADULT KNOW THESE WORD ARE NOT IN HERE BUT THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT

Video Thumbnail #1:




Video Thumbnail #2:




Video Thumbnail #3:




Video Url:


Embed Code:


Video Comments:
Diamonddavej (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 05:03:14 PM)
Neal, On last note, Sir Edmund Hally wrote in 1683. "..we have adventured to make the Earth hollow & to place another Globe within it: & I doubt not but this will find Opposers enough. I know twill be objected, That there is no Instance in Nature of the like thing; That if there was such a middle Globe it would not keep its place in the Centre, but be apt to deviate therefrom, & might possibly chock against the concave Shell, to the ruine or at least endammaging thereof" So no Hollow Earth!
Diamonddavej (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 04:17:58 PM)
Nea; Now I understand. Because the crust is iron rich, you take this as evidence that the core is iron poor! But the inner & outer core density is 9.9 to 12.5 grams cm3, what else but iron could be that dense. Anyway, I already told you about Iron meteorites, which represent the cores of asteroids - an Earth with an Iron core fits both the seismic data and structure of the asteroids. You must base your reasoning on actual facts/measurements, not random speculations.
Diamonddavej (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 04:09:27 PM)
neal; "Why do we have IRON UP HERE?" How about Iron Meteorites. The core formed, but the surface was kept rich in Iron by the continued addition of Iron from Meteorites, does that sound like a good Idea? There was a period of intense meteorite bombardment, ~3.8 billion years ago. Anyway, what's the point about the crust containing Iron?
MorituriMax (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 04:02:00 PM)
So, accroding to neal, big bang is magic. even with all the evidence to support it. Prime Matter Atoms are NOT magic, even with NO evidence to support them. Something smells very fishy about how neal defines magic.
nealadamsdotcom (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 04:00:26 PM)
Diamonddave, You know dave, in some ways, guys in the past were not so stupid. Many spoke of AETHER. Hell, they all did, till a couple of experiments shot it down. Now we are faced with Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Sounds like aether to me. I'm behind the times? I'll take that as a complement.
nealadamsdotcom (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 03:51:02 PM)
Diamonddave, I'm NOT saying "NO PRESSURE" In fact what ever pressure there is , a greater pressure must push outward. pressure is distributed. Think of an airliner's tire. "SIMPLE" air pressure holds up tens of tons of plane. How? No place for the pressure to go. How do we find the PRESSURE? I don't know. Not by math. You can't balance the pressure. Then we have THE MOLTEN IRON Theory. Iron as a liquid? Brings us to the acretionary theory. Iron Core. Why do we have IRON UP HERE?
nealadamsdotcom (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 03:33:34 PM)
ofnem, Assume NO MAGIC. Assume no Big Bang, what ever your interpretation of it is. Assume matter is made beginning with Pair-Production and processing up to high count atoms then through collecting Hydrogen suns. From there we collect ions on EM lines to build Higher count atoms which structure into Meteorites. Meteorites collect from internal and external accretion, ON the sun's electro-magnetic lines. As the sun grows, the guiding lines move outward. The growing planets move outward
Diamonddavej (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 03:26:55 PM)
Neal; I find it interesting that your view of the geology of the Earth is so similar to Thomas Burnets Sacred Theory of the Earth of 1684. In Sacred Theory of the Earth, Burnet wrote that "Earth is an egg, with the planetary crust as its perfect shell and the watery interior abyss as the yolk" Finny how a guy in the 1684 used an egg to understand the interior of Earth like you use coconuts, you're so behind the times Neal, by 324 years.
Diamonddavej (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 03:01:55 PM)
Neal; The outer core of the Earth was discovered by R.D. Oldham in 1906, seismic waves travel through the outer core at a speed of 8 to 10 kilometers per second. This means it is very dense, it cannot be plasma. Iron-Nickle alloy, at the conditions of the outer core, has a seismic velocity of between 8 to 10 kilometers per second.
Diamonddavej (Tuesday 2nd of December 2008 02:46:30 PM)
Neal; "I doubt it is very much," Seismic waves cannot propagate through a low or zero pressure plasma, that's a fact not a speculation. So, its a fact that the outer core cannot be a low pressure plasma. In space, no one can hear you scream.