RepoArt

onacoli10 (Tuesday 18th of November 2008 04:33:53 AM)

poor lil albert,

MidnightSkyBlue6 (Wednesday 5th of November 2008 05:02:58 PM)

We watched this in my psych class today.

imtherealK0NG0 (Friday 24th of October 2008 01:39:45 PM)

grammar*

lekythos (Tuesday 21st of October 2008 06:32:12 PM)

The "old looking footage" in the middle is from a film made by Watson and Raynor, depicted in the clip, likely around 1920. The film was made for teaching purposes after the experiment was over which is why Albert appears to be older than 9 months. Watson had intended to extinguish the conditioned fear but was interrupted by Albert's mother before he could do so. As for the rest, it an obvious is clever fraud, perhaps perpetrated by someone who dislikes Watson as suggested by Ickkyping.

pinkerchaos (Tuesday 21st of October 2008 01:54:22 PM)

hahaha...nice voice for baby albert

KingOfComments (Monday 3rd of November 2008 12:24:07 PM)

no.

mterin1990 (Saturday 18th of October 2008 11:30:56 PM)

Ive just been studying this in psychology...that's the worst experiment Ive ever seen, they were to rough with Albert and the animals if there was a ethics committee back then they would have been sued. Kinda wish they had been after seeing that. The textbooks don't list that kind of stuff

Kinematics001 (Saturday 18th of October 2008 09:13:28 PM)

I really pity the baby. He may still feel the effects of this classical conditioning in his later years of his life. He'll not be able to lead a normal life having phobia of anything thats fluffy. I hope something was done to take away his fears. I hope he'll be okay.

Bubelhaftisch (Friday 14th of November 2008 03:52:45 AM)

This experiment was done in the 1920's ... whatever's happened to 'Little Albert', it happened years ago. They never actually found out what happened to him afterwards.

feelee15 (Friday 17th of October 2008 06:43:01 AM)

unconditioned not unconditional