B. F. Skinner - Modelagem
BackB.F. Skinner's Shaping Experiment (Skinner's Box) An adherent to Watson's theory of behaviorism, B.F. Skinner was able to demonstrate how one can modify behavior through a process he called "shaping." In contrast to pure classical conditioning, Skinner utilized positive and negative reinforcement to cause behavior. Utilizing a contraption that became known as "Skinner's Box" he demonstrated how he could shape the behavior of pigeons by reinforcing their behavior. Fonte: http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=OurPoliticalWorld.
Channel: Education
Uploaded: September 22, 2006 at 4:56 pm
Author: pauloslomp
Length: 0:04:45
Rating: 5.00
Views: 68,341
Tags: skinner behaviorism behaviorismo comportamentismo conductismo
Video Comments:
BenjaminAConner (Thursday 9th of October 2008 08:34:12 PM)
By discovering the causes of behavior we can dispose of the imagined internal cause. - B.F. Skinner.
Now don't tell me that Skinner acknowledged internal processes. I've heard him call them imaginary with my own ears.
yoyorayoo (Tuesday 26th of August 2008 09:48:32 PM)
Steven Hawking probably embraces this shitbag's ideas. Skinner had no soul. You are just a dog to him and people who subscribe to his operant conditioning fucking bullshit. Nazi's probably love this man too.
HisLordshipTheOwl (Tuesday 7th of October 2008 05:36:02 PM)
Skinner's views on operant conditioning remain extremely influential in understanding animal behaviours, from hamster to human. However, he's not the be-all and end-all of human psychology.
Also - reductio ad Hilerum = autoloss.
flybybutterflies (Tuesday 26th of August 2008 12:31:26 AM)
my guinea pigs can do that too! watch?v=BAMgBp4i-Ik
flybybutterflies (Tuesday 26th of August 2008 12:26:32 AM)
I trained my guinea pigs to do that too! watch?v=BAMgBp4i-Ik
winterstellar (Sunday 20th of July 2008 08:09:10 AM)
Why is the rating disabled? This is an obvious 5-star video! :)
senseimak (Thursday 10th of July 2008 09:39:04 PM)
I think what you guys are missing is the value of individuals buying into one school of thought so avidly. Each individual that believes 100% in something devotes all of their time to advancing that field. If we have an individual obsessively advancing each field we end up with multiple schools of thoughts/research being advanced at very high rates and those who are in the middle can benefit greatly from the use of each of these schools of thought.
wiscsuzski (Tuesday 8th of July 2008 07:09:08 AM)
I thought his flaw was in assuming people were pigeons.
Makavelian67 (Sunday 15th of June 2008 06:04:10 PM)
you sure won't love them after they crap on your porch/balcony dozens of times a day!
megan4197 (Saturday 14th of June 2008 03:37:24 PM)
Pinker is a Sociobiologist. Sociobiology is inherently ad-hoc and therefore unscientific, in my opinion. If you want a valid biological theory, turn to Ethology.