RepoArt

Greefus (Monday 1st of December 2008 01:28:50 AM)

pop never gets old at least imo

sadeyez72 (Wednesday 12th of November 2008 09:32:12 PM)

I think you're missing the point. He's getting back to his punk/rock roots. The vocals in these types of songs aren't supposed to sound polished.

bilwit (Saturday 29th of November 2008 11:13:42 PM)

Mad respect to Graham, but anyone else notice how his solo stuff is less experimental and more contemporary compared his Blur work? I mean, there's nothing wrong with fast distorted guitars but come on.. it's been done many times before -- though I'm not saying it's a bad thing and he shouldn't! :\

uktah (Friday 7th of November 2008 06:34:37 AM)

Damon and Grahamw are both AWESOME!

thymorrison (Thursday 6th of November 2008 04:41:17 PM)

to palikarh grafei gamhsteres khthares....

rafaslad (Thursday 6th of November 2008 11:54:49 AM)

anyone think that hes kinda modelled himself on elvis costello?

cls14 (Thursday 30th of October 2008 04:27:38 PM)

Graham = Great. Damon = Great. Graham + Damon = Blue. Therefore Blur = Great Simple maths!

javarajavara (Sunday 26th of October 2008 10:59:31 PM)

if you expect blur's sound out of him.. why are you even listening to it, just keep listen to blur's song.. i listen to both damon and graham and rethink about them as a group and solo. i have to admit blur is just so great!! but they are both just too good to be in one same group forever..

dissolutionangel (Thursday 23rd of October 2008 04:49:05 PM)

*Deluxe

walterbaldeon (Sunday 19th of October 2008 11:32:27 AM)

Yes guys we all know Graham was the underestimated mastermind behind Blur, and definately he has good songs. But Damon by himself ain't that bad either. I listen to both even though the Blur sound is long gone. So what they still make great music.